
Try our newest merchandise
Starmer didn’t focus on risk of US imposing tariffs on UK imports in first name with Trump
Keir Starmer didn’t focus on the prospect of the US imposing tariffs on UK imports when he spoke to President Trump yesterday, Pippa Crerar stories.
NEW: These matters did *NOT* come up in Donald Trump’s weekend name with Keir Starmer:
Peter Mandelson
Defence spending hitting 2.5%
Trump’s plans for Greenland
Chagos Islands
US imposing tariffs on UK
Ukraine (which they’ve mentioned in depth beforehand)
However they’d a “lengthy and detailed” dialogue on vary of areas together with commerce, funding, deregulation.
The decision lasted 45 minutes. However Trump is known for rambling, and getting simply distract, in talks with different leaders, and so it’s laborious to know whether or not some matters had been ignored of the dialogue by chance or design.
Commenting on the decision on the Downing Road foyer briefing, the PM’s spokesperson mentioned it was “very heat”. He informed reporters:
It was a really heat name, and it was very constructive.
The spokesperson was unable to say when Starmer would possibly go to Washingon, or when Trump would possibly go to the UK. However he mentioned UK engagement with the brand new administration had been excellent.
There’s a variety of areas that we look ahead to working with President Trump and his a complete crew to construct on our already very sturdy and deep relationship.
Whether or not it’s on commerce, funding, whether or not it’s on safety and defence, and the Prime Minister appears ahead to assembly him quickly.
Key occasions
Some readers have requested for extra details about Craft, the corporate liable for the polling utilized by Channel 4 in its report saying 52% of Era Z saying Britain can be “a greater place if a robust chief was in cost who doesn’t must hassle with parliament and elections”. (See 9.32am.)
Craft are a analysis company, and their web site is right here. They’ve labored on comparable initiatives for Channel 4 earlier than, like this one.
Channel 4 says the polling was primarily based on a pattern involving 3,000 folks – 2,000 Gen Z folks (aged 13 to 27), with folks aged 28 to 65 making up the remaining 1,000.
And right here is the Channel 4 abstract of the outcomes written up by the Occasions
A big shift in direction of authoritarianism and radicalism in Gen Z:
1) A 3rd (33%) of Gen Z (13 to 27-year-olds) consider ‘the UK can be a be a greater place if the military was in cost’ – in comparison with simply 18% of 45-65-year-olds
2) Greater than half (52%) of Gen Z assume “the UK can be a greater place if a robust chief was in cost who doesn’t must hassle with parliament and elections’
3) 47% agree that ‘your entire method our society is organised have to be radically modified via revolution’ – in comparison with simply 33% of 45 to 65-year-olds
A stark and rising gender divergence amongst the younger:
1) 45% of male respondents aged 13-27 assume that ‘we have now gone up to now in selling ladies’s equality that we’re discriminating towards males’
2) 44% agree that ‘relating to giving ladies equal rights, issues have gone far sufficient’
Gen Z faces rising uncertainty in who and what to belief and so they have a ‘flatter’ belief hierarchy, valuing mainstream retailers, influencers, and friends kind of equally:
1) Social media posts from buddies (58%) and influencers (42%) are as – generally extra – trusted than established journalism (though belief within the BBC is larger than older generations – 43% vs 38% of 28-65s – so possibly some inexperienced shoots for them) and one third (33%) belief various internet-based media personalities (vs 12% of 28-65s)
2) 36% of 13-27s belief broadsheet newspapers and their web sites vs 23% of 28-65s
3) Counterintuitively, Gen Z really belief politicians far more than different generations – 27% vs simply 9% for over 28s
Ed Miliband tells MPs UK must ‘velocity up, not decelerate’ in drive to web zero
As vitality secretary, Ed Miliband is the particular person in authorities most liable for making certain that the UK meets its web zero targets, and over current days that has been a trick transient to carry. Final week he was pressured to disclaim that he was contemplating resigning over the federal government’s determination to again a 3rd runway at Heathrow. And Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, appeared to downgrade the significance of the online zero targets by saying progress was extra essential.
This afternoon Miliband is giving proof to the Commons environmental audit committee, and he used a gap assertion to hit again strongly on the suggestion his agenda was being marginalised. Listed below are the details.
-
Miliband insisted that there was “no contradication between web zero and financial progress”. Downing Road was utilizing the identical line this morning (see 1.31pm), however Miliband made the case in additional element. He mentioned:
The clear energy mission has two limbs. It has clear energy by 2030, and accelerating to web zero or assembly our carbon budgets.
And this is without doubt one of the prime minister’s 5 missions as a result of we consider it’s the route not simply to tackling the local weather disaster – clearly essential – but in addition the path to vitality safety, to decrease payments and good jobs and financial progress.
Vitality safety – as a result of we begin from the price of dwelling disaster that so many companies and households have been via, which confirmed the risks from our publicity to fossil fuels.
Jobs and financial progress – as a result of we see the clear vitality transition because the financial alternative of our time. Certainly, this authorities sees no contradiction between web zero and financial progress. We consider they go completely hand in hand, as a result of web zero is a significant contributor to progress, may be, and the local weather disaster is the largest long-term financial risk our nation faces.
I might additionally argue … that the entire proof about our nationwide curiosity says we must always velocity up, not decelerate. Geopolitical instability continues to place stress on vitality costs; we have to go all out for clear energy. The financial alternatives are going to go to those that lead, not those that dangle again. And on local weather, most lately in Los Angeles, we’ve seen the local weather disaster is actual.
The local weather consensus at house and overseas is underneath better pressure than it has been for a while … Actually, there are siren voices within the UK who’re saying we must always step again from this agenda, that now’s the time to surrender on local weather motion as a result of it’s not in our nationwide curiosity.
And I believe this can be a huge battle about the way forward for our nation.
I wish to be extremely clear with you about this. This authorities isn’t going to try this. We’re not going to step again. We’re not going to heed these siren voices. We’re going to step up, the truth is, and we’re going to steer, not comply with.
And why? As a result of regardless of the disinformation, the misinformation, the reality is that local weather motion is crucial for our nationwide self curiosity and is supported by the British folks.
Miliband didn’t immediately point out Kemi Badenoch at this level, however he was clearly referring to her. Badenoch calls herself a “web zero sceptic”. Miliband burdened that previously Conservatives did agree with Labour on this. The Tories supported Labour’s Local weather Change Act, he mentioned. As prime ministers, David Cameron and Theresa Might each supported motion on web zero. And the Tory Cop president Alok Sharma additionally supported these objectives, he mentioned.
‘Convey it on’ – lawyer normal says he is joyful to have battle with critics over Labour upholding worldwide regulation
Eleni Courea
Richard Hermer, the lawyer normal, has rebuked critics of his method in direction of worldwide regulation in an interview with the Home journal.
The interview was performed earlier than the Conservatives demanded an investigation into whether or not Hermer had any conflicts of curiosity arising from his work as a human rights barrister.
However Hermer was requested about Tory claims that he and Keir Starmer are taking a very legalistic method to authorities on the expense of the UK’s nationwide curiosity. In a speech he gave in October, Hermer mentioned that “worldwide regulation is the rule of regulation writ massive” and that it was “not merely some form of non-compulsory add-on, with which states can choose or select whether or not to conform. It’s central to making sure our prosperity and safety.”
“Convey it on, if that’s the battle folks wish to have,” Hermer informed the journal in response to criticisms of his method.
I’m not likely certain what they’re driving at. If they’re criticising the federal government as a result of it desires to adjust to worldwide regulation, in the event that they wish to choose a battle with the federal government as a result of it says worldwide regulation is essential and that we wish to uphold worldwide regulation, then that’s a battle I’d fairly look ahead to.
Conservative criticisms are centred across the authorities’s determination to cede management over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius after a ruling by the Worldwide Court docket of Justice discovered the UK didn’t have sovereignty over them.
Tories complain US navy households get VAT exemption from non-public faculty charges not out there to British navy households
Within the Commons Luke Pollard, a defence minister, has been responding to an pressing query in regards to the report saying the federal government is more likely to delay elevating defence spending to 2.5% of GDP till after the overall election. Like Downing Road earlier, he refused to verify or deny the story, however mentioned the federal government might give a timetable for reaching 2.5% when the defence evaluate stories. (See 1.48pm.)
However, as he requested his pressing query, James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, additionally requested Pollard to justify the revelation that US navy households gained’t must pay VAT on faculty charges for kids in public colleges in Britain, whereas British navy households won’t get an equal exemption.
In a report on this final week, the Telegraph mentioned:
HM Income and Customs (HMRC) this week confirmed the 20pc VAT levy on charges, launched on January 1, doesn’t apply to the kids of US service personnel. This is because of an historic aid between the 2 nations.
In a briefing observe, seen by The Telegraph, HMRC mentioned non-public faculty charges are thought of a service and would due to this fact permit American navy households to keep away from paying the tax because it fell underneath the “VAT-free buy scheme”.
Cartlidge mentioned:
I don’t begrudge [the exemption], the US forces are primarily based in our nation to defend us, however we wish the identical therapy for our folks.
In response, Pollard mentioned that the federal government had raised the continuity of schooling allowance (CEA) – a grant out there to service households in the event that they wish to put their kids into non-public schooling as a result of they’re shifting frequently. It covers as much as 90% of common boarding faculty charges.
Keir Starmer informed Micheál Martin, the Irish PM (taoiseach) that “that the UK-Eire relationship was going from energy to energy, and it was important to proceed that in such a unstable geopolitical context” in a name this morning, No 10 mentioned.
Starmer, who developed an in depth curiosity in Eire when he was a human rights adviser to the Police Service of Northern Eire and whose chief of employees, Morgan McSweeney, is from County Cork, was talking to Martin to congratuate him on his re-appointment as taoiseach.
Phillipson says Tory name for regulation banning smartphones at school not wanted as a result of ‘overwhelming majority’ of faculties do that anyway
Bridget Phillipson, the schooling secretary, has dismissed a Conservative proposal to ban smartphone use in colleges as a “headline-grabbing gimmick”.
Throughout schooling questions within the Commons, Laura Trott, the shadow schooling secretary requested Phillipson if the federal government can be backing a Tory modification to the kids’s wellbeing and colleges invoice to implement this in England.
She mentioned smartphones within the classroom had been unhealthy for academic attainment in colleges. The final Conservative goverment launched steerage to cease this, she mentioned. However she claimed that this was not working and {that a} ban was now wanted.
Phillipson mentioned that she agreed that pupils shouldn’t have smartphones at school, however that she didn’t assume additional laws was wanted. She informed MPs”
I agree that telephones haven’t any place within the classroom. It’s completely proper that colleges take agency motion to cease their use, and I do know that that’s what the overwhelming majority of faculties already do.
Final July [the Conservative government] mentioned that it didn’t have to legislate on this space. Nothing has modified on this time. I again the method that they took in July on this space. But once more, one other headline grabbing gimmick, no plans to drive up requirements in our colleges.
Underneath the Tory modification, colleges in England must put in place insurance policies banning smartphone use by pupils in the course of the faculty day. However there can be some flexibility for sixth varieties, and for residential and boarding colleges.
Many elements of NHS in Scotland in ‘disaster’, say first minister John Swinney
Severin Carrell
John Swinney, Scotland’s first minister, has admitted vital elements of the NHS are in disaster because of persevering with impacts of the Covid pandemic, delays in ready and discharge instances and escalating prices.
Scottish Nationwide celebration first ministers have been cautious till now to keep away from the phrase “disaster”, regardless of repeated and escalating warnings from the British Medical Affiliation and the Royal Faculty of Nursing the NHS in Scotland is in perma-crisis.
Neil Grey, the well being secretary, explicitly denied that was true in an interview with Holyrood journal final 12 months. However addressing well being professionals and docs’ leaders at Heriot Watt college on Monday morning, Swinney used it, and admitted the NHS confronted “nice challenges”.
He first pointed at “durations of actual disaster” such because the flu epidemic this winter which noticed the very best peak in circumstances since 2010, after which acknowledged systemic crises in day after day companies.
“So let’s speak first about these quick issues, the disaster dealing with too many elements of our Nationwide Well being Service,” he mentioned, pointing to unacceptably lengthy ready instances and delayed discharges placing sufferers, households and the NHS. “It’s the very definition of a vicious circle, and it has to return to an finish,” he mentioned.
Asserting a better emphasis on main and neighborhood care, and higher use of information, he mentioned a brand new app because of be piloted later this 12 months would enhance entry, and pledged his new technique would ship 150,000 further appointments and elective operations this 12 months.
There are challenges, some companies are struggling [but] there may be nothing fallacious with the Nationwide Well being Service that may’t be fastened by what is correct with the Nationwide Well being Service.
Swinney seems to have scrapped a collection of different targets set by his predecessors and did not set out particular targets on staffing ranges.
Matt McLaughlin, Unison Scotland’s well being spokesman, was scathing. He mentioned:
After nearly 20 years John Swinney has delivered the identical outdated guarantees.
The primary minister’s renewal framework, launched at the moment, doesn’t start to deal with the social care disaster, and employees might be offended after he mentioned they ‘have to do extra laps of the monitor’.
No 10 says Palestinians ought to be allowed to return to Gaza to rebuild their houses, after Trump suggests they should not
Downing Road has refused to again President Trump’s name for Palestinians to be refused to permit to return to Gaza.
Requested about Trump’s remark, the PM’s spokesperson informed journalists on the foyer briefing:
Palestinian civilians ought to be capable of return to and rebuild their houses and their lives.
Because the overseas secretary mentioned, for the folks of Gaza, so a lot of whom have misplaced their lives, houses or family members, the final 14 months of battle have been a dwelling nightmare. That’s why the UK is regularly pressed for a decision to the battle in Gaza.
Downing Road has defended the Royal Navy’s determination to not use HMS Agincourt because the title for a brand new submarine after the choice was described as “woke nonsense”.
In accordance with a report within the Solar, the hunter-killer submarine, which remains to be underneath building, was because of be named after Henry V’s victory, following predecessor boats which have additionally used the title. However the Solar claims the title has been modified to HMS Achilles to keep away from reminding the French of one in all their nice defeats.
Requested in regards to the report on the Downing Road foyer briefing, the PM’s spokesperson mentioned that HMS Achilles was extra applicable title provided that this 12 months marks the eightieth anniversary of the top of the second world warfare. The spokesperson mentioned:
We’re pleased with our nation’s wealthy navy historical past and the numerous well-known battles fought, and it’s why the seventh boat within the astute class might be known as HMS Achilles.
As I’m certain you’ll bear in mind, HMS Achilles acquired battle honours in the course of the second world warfare. So this title is especially applicable this 12 months as we mark the VE and VJ Day eightieth anniversaries.
Downing Road was not concerned within the determination over the title, which was made by the names and badges committee.
Commenting on the Solar’s story, Grant Shapps, a former Tory defence secretary, mentioned:
Renaming the HMS Agincourt is nothing wanting sacrilege. This submarine carries a reputation that honours a defining second in British historical past.
Underneath Labour, woke nonsense is being put forward of custom and our Armed Forces’ proud heritage.
No 10 refuses to disclaim report saying elevating defence spending to 2.5% of GDP could also be delayed till after subsequent election
This morning the Occasions splashed on a narrative saying Keir Starmer is more likely to delay elevating defence spending to 2.5% of GDP till after the following election. Of their report, Steven Swinford and George Grylls say:
Sir Keir Starmer is predicted to withstand stress from President Trump and the British navy to extend defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2030 due to considerations in regards to the state of public funds, The Occasions has been informed …
Starmer has pledged to extend defence spending from 2.3 per cent to 2.5 per cent and has commissioned a strategic defence evaluate that is because of conclude in spring. After that, the federal government will set a deadline for the two.5 per cent goal.
A senior authorities supply mentioned: “If we attempt to hit the goal by 2030 it can imply deeper cuts to public companies within the run-up to the election. It looks like a non-starter.” The following normal election can be due by mid-2029.
On the Downing Road foyer briefing the PM’s spokesperson didn’t deny the story, however wouldn’t affirm it both. He simply mentioned the federal government was “working at tempo” on its strategic defence evaluate, and that the pathway to reaching 2.5% can be set out when the SDR stories within the spring.
At 3.30pm a defence minister will reply to an pressing query tabled by James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, on this story.